Range Report: FEG PMK .380 ACP.... - Pistolsmith

Go Back   Pistolsmith > Pistolsmith Forum > Gun Talk

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2003, 06:05 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,371
Range Report: FEG PMK .380 ACP....

Hello. I bought this pistol in '93 for a bit under $200 with several extra magazines and a couple of boxes of factory ammunition from a friend who needed money. Initially, I was not too impressed with it as the finish appears to be blue on the slide, trigger, triggerguard, pins, and decocking lever. The frame and exterior of the barrel chamber seem to be painted or black anodized, but if the latter, it's very soft!
Toolmarks are not hard to find inside and out; I didn't even shoot the thing for quite a time. Eventually, I did and was pretty favorably surprised!

The Pistol: The Hungarian FEG PMK has a 3.9" bbl and is a conventional DA/SA semiautomatic chambered in .380 ACP. I believe some are chambered in 9x18mm Makarov as well. The single-stack magazine nearly holds 8 rounds, but actually only holds 7. With one in the bbl, the shooter has eight shots on tap in a fully-loaded PMK. The magazine release is behind the triggerguard, but higher than those on such known pistols as the 1911 and P-35. Sights are fixed and tiny with the rear sight drift adjustable for windage. The top of the slide's serrated as is the trigger-face. At the left rear of the slide, is the decocking lever which does remain down unless pushed back upward; when down it prevents the trigger from being pulled and is also an exterior safety.

The magazine is unusual on this pistol. The tab that activates the hold open device is a sprung piece that's part of the magazine follower. It is pressed in when the follower's in the magazine body and springs outward when the follower's all the way up. You can see it in the picture below.

I don't recall having seen this type of thing before!

The plastic grips are held on with one screw each and the rear gripstrap is more humped than the Walther PP it so closely imitates.

In this picture you can see the small sights, scraped blk anodizing in the ejection port where the aluminum frame surrounds the bbl and the "Waltheresque" look. The slide has a decent bright blue finish.

The pistol field-strips in the same manner as the Walter PP-series with the major components being similar. Internally, however, the two pistols differ and parts do NOT interchange.

Ammunition: Since pistols of this type are not generally purchased for other than close range personal defense, the bulk of the loads used today are JHPs. One type of ball was used.

The rounds used are listed below and the 10-shot average velocity when fired from the PMK is shown in ft/sec.

Fiocchi 95 gr FMJ: 1004 ft/sec
PMC 90 gr JHP: 969 ft/sec
Winchester 95 gr SXT JHP: 953 ft/sec
Federal 90 gr Classic JHP: 1033 ft/sec
Federal 90 gr HydraShok JHP: 1036 ft/sec
Corbon 90 gr +P JHP: 1110 ft/sec
Glaser Silver 70 gr Pre-Fragmented: 1396 ft/sec

No handloads were used.

Shooting: Today's shooting tests took place at two distances, 7 and 10 yards. Shots were fired standing w/2-hand hold. No shooting at farther distances were done due to what most will use the pistol for and the small sights.

10 Yards: These are simply 5-shot groups done slow-fire and beginning with the pistol cocked.

Point of aim was 6 O'Clock on the yellow inner dot.

Do not assume that the Corbon was truly the most inherently accurate as this pistol was difficult for me to aim with extreme clarity. Still, several of the loads shown produced darned decent groups.

I was very surprised to see that the 70 gr Glaser Silver grouped so very well! This is an improvement over the early versions. It appears that the shot being tightly compressed makes a difference!

7 Yards: This was simply done by raising the pistol from a low-ready to eye level and firing 8 rounds as quickly as possible. The first shot was fired double-action and is the one on the far left of the target. I used Corbon +P JHP as it had the sharpest recoil and would present the most "challenge" in recoil-control.

9' closer and the group's significantly larger than above. Speed does that. Maybe a balance of our own personal speed and accuracy levels would be a good thing to keep in mind should we have to fire defensively?

Observations: This gun is not ever going to be the top ten for surface finish or high-visibility sights. Finish is utilitarian and whatever the finish is on the frame, it scratches easily. The DA pull is very similar to that of the Walther PP, but the SA, while not bad, is a bit less "crisp" than on the German/French/American pistol. The reason for this is that as the trigger's pressed rearward, it lifts the firing pin upward into firing position. The firing pin's locked unless the trigger's rearward, something not the case with the Walther PP, PPK, or PPK/s.

In this picture you can see the rectangular rear of the firing pin in its downward position before the trigger's pressed.

When the trigger's pressed rearward, it rises into the rectangular opening just above it.

...the firing pin ready to fire and in its upward position...

(That rear sight's a peach, ain't it? Hahahhaha!)

So, what's it good for? Well, that depends on the owner and his/her intended uses and perceived needs. I'd not thought about this pistol much in years and had previously shot it just to make sure it would function. Today was the first time I gave it a half-way real test. It passed. What needs to be remembered is that for some folks, buying even a $500 pistol is beyond their means; the price paid by some for a match bbl and subsequent fitting is likely more than others might be able to afford w/o doing without some necessity like electricity, etc. You get the idea. Power-wise, most of us would agree that it's at the lower end of the "ballistic comfort scale," but more powerful pistols using locked breeches do usually cost more. I'm not sure what these things are selling for now, but I'd assume they can be had new for $200 or so.

The biggest surprise of the day for me was that I did NOT get the dreaded Walther slide bite! Not even a scratch! This simply does not happen for me and I brought two or three bandaids for the inevitable; I can only surmise that the pronounced hump on the gun's rear gripstrap somehow keeps the hand down out of the way. The tang might be a bit thicker than that of the PP, but visually, I see no apparent differences.

You can see the position of my hand to the slide's bottom edges in this picture.

The external extractor looks almost exactly like that of the Walther, but in checking both I noted that the FEG more securely grasps the hull's rim.

This gun is more reliable with a wider variety of JHPs than is my Walther PP which was bought brand new years ago. I know that statement's not exactly what I like to say being as I own the Walther, but it is what it is. This particular FEG PMK feed every brand of JHP tried today flawlessly except one, the Corbon. Even then, the failure to feed reliably occurred only when the first round was being stripped from the magazine. IF the magazine was fired holding only 6, it always fed fine. During the 7-Yard test above, I put one round in the pistol and fired it DA at the target. I then loaded 6 and chambered a round and loaded another round into the magazine such that I could get off the remaining 7 w/o a jam. This was obviously the most "potent" of the conventional JHPs and it grouped best as well, but for defensive use, reliability must supercede that. With everything else, it ran 100%.

Though visually very similar to both the HydraShok and especially the PMC JHP, the Corbon 90 gr JHP would consistently jam after the 1st shot when trying to feed from a full magazine.

I checked the feed ramp for gouging today after these jams and the rest of the shooting but found none, though the finish is badly worn on the ramp.

The PMK's feed ramp is not steeply angled and I think this contributed to its very good reliability with most JHPs tested.

Cases were ejected about 8' to the right with most of the loads and a couple of feet farther with the Corbon. I don't recall on the Glasers. I do recall their report being the sharpest and loudest of the bunch.

There was no tendency for the gun to shift position during slow or rapid fire and hammer bite did not occur.

Just for grins, I fired a Corbon 90 gr +P JHP into a couple of plastic water jugs. The expanded round is shown below and was caught in the second jug. I'd estimate penetration at 7 to 10".

At a bit over 1100 ft/sec, Corbon's 90 gr JHP expanded nicely with the recovered bullet weighing 88.9 grains and measuring 0.60" across the widest portion of the mushroom. Measuring out to include the one petal that did not fold back, you get 0.795".

Just how long this pistol would hold up to a steady diet of +P I don't know, but IF reliable in one's individual PMK, it'd likely handle more than the average user would fire.

I don't drink all that much milk so the following rounds were "tested" using the "scientific mud expansion test." I fired 'em into mud.

Impacting at 953 ft/sec, Winchester's 95 gr SXT did NOT expand well, although it appeared to've been trying! This bullet would like perform at 9mm velocities.

These are the very first PMC 90 gr JHPs I've ever seen expand!

Federal's 90 gr Classic Hi Shok JHP also did well.

Without question, the Fiocchi ball and the Federal 90 gr JHP fed the slickest of all rounds tested. Were I using this pistol for protection, I'd probably go with the Federal's more rounded ogive. Even with expansion, assuming enough penetration at least for a frontal shot, I don't think that the added "power" afforded by a round that might hang up overrides the need for reliability and particularly placement with this caliber. Others might opt for the Glaser, but I fear underpenetration with it. Nothing we can do with this pistol's bullets are going to transform it into a really great "stopper;" placement will be the critical component in making a felon go down because he has to rather than just wants to.

It simply is not going to be a forty-five.

In recent years, the FEG pistols in 9x18 Makarov have gained a pretty good following. I can see why in that these little things are reliable and accurate for pocket guns. I've compared it a bit to the Walther PP-type pistols, but it should also be pitted against another obvious handgun, the Makarov. The latter's larger and heavier, but between the two, I do prefer the Mak; it's more comfortable to me and built like a tank. I find the PMK's grip not all that comfortable, but like the Mak's fine. I think that in a "torture test" of rounds fired the Makarov would likely outlast the PMK.

Still, I like the little thing and might just shoot it now and again for fun.

Remove Ads
Old 02-05-2003, 04:32 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Texas!!!!
Posts: 827
Another great report. I am continually amazed at the value in the different FEG handguns and I've yet to find one that hasn't been a reliable shooter.
Old 02-05-2003, 06:43 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 173

I had one of these little babies, but I sold it last year. Mine was very accurate but the POA was not POC (shot high). It was very reliable tho. I would like to say that your results from the Corbon +P's is not an accident. They ARE the most accurate round that I found for my FEG, too. FEG's are known amongst their owners to NOT have the slide bite of the Walther and to be more accurate than the Walthers. That's the main reason I bought mine over a PP or PPK. My brother has one that is a tack driver, and it is an older FEG. If you can find the guns made in the 80's, they are made much better than the new production FEG's. Less toolmarking and much tighter.

Any plans to compare this one to a Bersa? I'm thinking about buying a new .380 in the near future.

Enjoyed your report!
Old 02-05-2003, 06:55 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,371
Hello. No, not right now as I don't own a Bersa. In the past I did and they worked fine.

Old 05-30-2003, 01:20 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Southwest
Posts: 2,371
Hello. Things change. There will be a range report on the Bersa Thunder .380 in the near future.


  Pistolsmith > Pistolsmith Forum > Gun Talk

Search tags for this page
feg 380

feg 380 pistol

feg 380 pistol review

feg pmk 380

feg pmk 380 magazine

feg pmk 380 pistol

feg pmk 380 review
pmk 380 magazine
pmk 380 pistol
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Kimber. first trip to the range (range report- TLE II) Barry in Indiana Kimber Pistols 0 06-23-2004 11:46 AM
Range report P01 Espi CZ Pistols 2 10-25-2003 05:08 AM
pm9 range report chiromikey Kahr Pistols 6 03-05-2003 01:42 PM
Range report on new USP 45 fortyfiveshooter Heckler & Koch Pistols 3 01-28-2002 10:34 PM
Range Report bowhunter Kimber Pistols 1 11-08-2001 08:38 AM

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List

Powered by vBulletin 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 1999-2012 Pistolsmith. All rights reserved.