Pistolsmith

Go Back   Pistolsmith > Rifle and Shotgun Forum > Precision Rifles


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2007, 06:11 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 520
Kimber 82 v. Savage

I'm looking for a .22 target rifle and have an interest in the above 2 rifles.

The Kimber is available from the CMP. The good part is it being available from the CMP and, being made when Kimber was in Oregon, may have some collector value. They are also suppose to be quite accurate.

The Savage comes with the Accu-Trigger and target sights, with front sights inserts. It is also current production and has a good reputation for accuracy.

The downside to a Kimber is that parts are hard to obtain and it costs twice what the Savage does.

Thoughts on which is more cost-effective for infomal club matches?
 
Remove Advertisements
Old 02-08-2010, 09:46 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1
I bought a Kimber 82G and I love it. After spending years looking through riflescopes I've found that I love the iron sights. These sights are better than anything you'll find on a Savage. I'm not putting Savage down, on the contrary, I own two, a F class and a model 10 and I wouldn't sell either of them. The Kimbers you get from the CMP are a steal at $600. They're new rifles with a forend rail, hand stop, target adjustable peep sights with inserts, butt spacers, and a nice adjustable trigger. I saw a used one on Cabelas for $1100.00, I like to call it the " poor mans Anschutz ". You won't be disappointed.
 
Reply

  Pistolsmith > Rifle and Shotgun Forum > Precision Rifles


Thread Tools
Display Modes









Copyright © 1999-2010 Pistolsmith. All rights reserved.