45 ACP Defensive Round - Page 2 - Pistolsmith
Pistolsmith

Go Back   Pistolsmith > Ammunition Forum > .45 ACP

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2004, 05:34 AM   #11
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 184
Hyda Shok

I do not trust Hydra Shok at all. My PD used 230 Hydra Shoks for a lot of years and had very poor results. Over penetration and no expansion were the rule. We did some extensive tests and changed to Winchester Ranger SXT in the 230 +P load.

For over the counter, Speer Gold Dot and Standard SXT are almost as good. The new Federal HST round, while not bonded, beat all comers in expansion and looked real good.

Remington bonded Golden Saber expanded about average but we had problems with inconsistant velocity. Some of the rounds ran out of a 5" brl. in the low 700 fps. During one test, the extreme velocity spread was 96 fps. The bullet design is good and I hope that Remington has improved the consistancy.
 
Remove Ads
Old 12-02-2004, 11:07 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 27
3.5 inch barrel

I am considering defensive loads for a new Colt Officer pistol with 3.5 inch barrel. Any recommendations for the short barrel? Specific ammo recommendations would be appreciated along with your reasons.

I was looking at 185s but thought with the drop in velocity (don't know by how much) that maybe I should bump up the weight and use 230s. Over penetration is a major concern with this.

Thanks,
Frank G
 
Old 12-09-2004, 11:13 AM   #13
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Less Penetrative .45 ACP Defensive Loads

If overpenetration is at all a concern, I would only use the Winchester 185 grn Silvertip, regardless of barrel length. The only way to measure velocity loss is to chronograph YOUR pistol using that ammunition, as barrel tolerances and condition will also determine the results.
 
 
Old 12-23-2004, 05:25 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 391
If over penatration is a major concern I would use something like mag-safe or glaser! NO jacked hp should be used! 8)
 
Old 12-23-2004, 06:26 AM   #15
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 173
Corbon or Ranger T

I'm going to chime in for Corbon ammo. I've used the 230 and 200 grain +P loads. I carry the 200 gr loads. They also make 165gr and 185gr loads I believe. It's premium, accurate ammo. I've never had any Corbon ammo fail to feed or fire in my Pro Carry.

If you can get your hands on Winchester Ranger T 230gr ammo, it's probably the best out there. It's LEO ammo, but you can get your hands on it from time to time, and it is not illegal for a civilian to carry it or buy it.

Go to www.ammolab.com to see test results on various ammo.
 
Old 01-04-2005, 03:41 PM   #16
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 8
Why would using your own reloads be a liability? The "personal defense" ammo is marketed for its ability to expand and incapcitate a subject and generally "just kill the perp".

My reloaded ammo would do the same thing if I selected the right bullet, so what's the big deal?
 
Old 01-05-2005, 06:41 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 391
Because you do not make millions of $ making and improving ammo. You do not have lawyers that work full time defending you and your brand of ammo for this slap happy SUE me for coughing in public world. Being liable mostly applies to LE but bullets fail to do what they are supposed to do period. There is not one made that is perfect. Civil suits can come in many different forms. Take for instant, you have a bad guy come to you and say shoot me or I will stab you with this here knife. So you shoot him, he dies. He then has family come out of the woodwork that never spoke his name until they thought they could make money on it and sue you into the stone age. Some of the suits will possibly read like this. Me VS Ammo manufacturer, Me VS Firearms Company, Me VS The Guy that Shot my beloved cousin on my mothers brother-N- laws side, and so on. Me being the bad guy’s family so liability for LE is taken up by the company that makes the ammo and does not fall on their heads.
One thing is for sure so think about it VERY carefully, you will be sued if you shoot someone period...... And they will sue you any and every way possible. 8)
 
Old 01-05-2005, 07:07 AM   #18
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by CallTheBall
Why would using your own reloads be a liability?
It wouldn't. The use of handloads does not turn a justified shooting, into a non-justified one. It does not turn an otherwise innocent man into a murderer.

If the shooting is justified, then it does not matter what you shot him with - it is the ACT of the shooting that is under investigation, NOT the tool used to do it. And the use of a specific weapon or ammo (provided they are not illegal for you to own/use/carry in your area) will not affect any decisions. If you have made a choice to pull the trigger on someone and you are found innocent and justified, there is no way in hell that the use of reloads could impact that decision.

Unless you have Bozo the Clown as your attorney, the use of handloads can be easily defended and justified. Remember - it is YOU and your actions that are on trial - not your ammo or firearm.

I am still waiting for someone to point me to a criminal conviction where an otherwise innocent man was found guilty because of reloads.........
 
Old 01-05-2005, 07:36 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 391
Shane is right too....... But being in Law Enforcement has taught me that if the judge will allow it, they will sue you for everything possible. But the way Shane is right is they are going to try you for the actual incident and then if you are justified you are good and that is it for that part. Then comes the dreaded civil trials. That is were they sue for anything and everything. But back to Shane’s point and what I will end mine on, It is better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6. Be safe. 8)
 
Old 01-05-2005, 01:37 PM   #20
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
This is whats stupid with our society. We have intruders, murderers and evry kind of bad guy protected by the law. They break in to your house and you are still succeptible to lawsuits for protecting your personal property. :evil:

I cant understand how, by breaking the law, the badguy, his family and pet can sue me for protecting my family in my home. What happened to no tresspassing?

Anyway I am looking for good home defense ammo for a Kimber .45 SuperMatch II. I do not want to the bullet to penetrate my walls and my neighbors as well. I want it to stop in my walls. Any ideas?
 
Reply

  Pistolsmith > Ammunition Forum > .45 ACP


Search tags for this page
45 acp 200 gdhp defense handload
,
45 acp hardball for defense
,

45 acp hardball for self defense

,
45 hardball for defense
,
45acp handload performance
,
federal 230 hst versus 230 hydrshok
,
hk usp 45 federal hst
,
hk usp 45 hst velocity
,
using 45 acp as defensive round
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Did You Decide on Your Defensive Ammunition? Stephen A. Camp Ammunition 32 10-14-2005 04:24 PM
New Defensive Ammo Fred the dog Ammunition 7 03-12-2003 05:11 PM
The Defensive 1911.... Stephen A. Camp Gun Talk 10 12-21-2002 08:45 AM
Best combat/defensive grip Corey Training and Tactics 4 02-07-2002 11:47 AM
COR-BON's new line of defensive ammo! Captain Ammunition 6 05-29-2001 02:40 AM

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List


Powered by vBulletin 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 1999-2012 Pistolsmith. All rights reserved.