|01-01-2007, 06:49 PM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Springfield rear tang and beavertail grip safeties
I have an older (1980's) parkerized Springfield Armory - pre "Mil Spec" no Brazil stamp on the frame. It has been a pretty good pistol and has digested several thousand rounds through it. I've been using an old Pachmar grip safety, comfortable but much lower than the GI, or current crop of beavertail safeties.
I purchased a couple Wilson drop-in beavertail grip safeties for the Colt Government Model. They fit fine in my Colt Goverment Model. Even before starting I could tell there would be a problem with the Springfield. The rear tang is short, shorter in fact than a Colt Commander. This was tested because a friend had installed a Wilson drop-in on one of his Commanders so we tried it on the Springfield - still a large gap.
This doesn't make a difference with the standard GI/Colt grip safety, but if you are considering a beavertail grip safety, beware that the Springfield frame is not the same a Colt Government.
Note that Smith & Alexander sell a special beavertail safety specifically for the Springfield that uses a 0.220" radius instead of the normal 0.250" radius.
|Search tags for this page|
1911 beavertail grip safety parkerized,
1911 parkerized beaver grip safety,
1911 short tang grip safety,
beavertail tang for 1911,
grip safety tang,
springfield armory grip safety,
springfield beavertail grip safety,
springfield grip safety
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Textured grip tang/ beavertail?||Curare||Pistolsmiths||2||11-16-2005 02:42 PM|
|Am I the only one who dosent like these new grip safeties?||Bruce P.||Workshop||9||05-07-2005 01:15 PM|
|Deactivating grip safeties||BillD||M1911 Pistols||57||04-26-2004 01:15 PM|
|Springfield grip safeties???||Rich S.||Pistolsmiths||7||02-04-2003 11:07 AM|
|Wilson grip safeties: old vs new.||EuroMan||Gun Accessories||0||06-23-2001 10:53 AM|